| 1. | Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):396-407. Epub 2010 Jan 12.Switch to a raltegravir-based regimen versus continuation of a lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen in stable HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia (SWITCHMRK 1 and 2): two multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trials.Eron JJ, Young B, Cooper DA, Youle M, Dejesus E, Andrade-Villanueva J, Workman C, Zajdenverg R, Fätkenheuer G, Berger DS, Kumar PN, Rodgers AJ, Shaughnessy MA, Walker ML, Barnard RJ, Miller MD, Dinubile MJ, Nguyen BY, Leavitt R, Xu X, Sklar P; SWITCHMRK 1 and 2 investigators.Collaborators: Workman C, Lalonde R, Rachlis A, Graham HR, Walmsley S, Gerstoft J, Mathiesen L, Arasteh K, Faetkenheuer G, Jaeger H, van Lunzen J, Antinori A, Lazzarin A, Mazzotta F, Rizzardini G, Antunes F, Branco T, Maltez F, Marques R, Sarmento R, Teofilo E, Ibarguren KA, Garcia JG, Hernandez-Quero J, Aldegue JL, Fisher M, Johnson MA, Nelson M, Orkin C, Bellos N, Berger D, Church LW, DeJesus E, de la Garza G, Gottlieb M, Hannon J, Liporace RL, Mills A, Myers RA, Pierone G, Poretz DM, Redfield RR, Rieg G, Ruane P, Saag MS, Scarsella A, Slim J, Squires K, Young B, Cooper D, Gold J, Workman C, Leite OM, Souza TN, Zajdenverg R, Alvarez CA, Arango AI, Velez JD, Patel AK, Saple DG, Andrade J, Torres I, Valdovinos S, Levia PL, Urbina FM, Fernandez JS, Andrews SM, Baraldi E, Johnson DW, Miller S, Anekthananon T, Kiertiburanakul S, Sungkanuparph S, Campbell T, Currier J, Frank I, Garcia-Diaz J, Gathe J, Kumar PN, Parenti D, Perez G, Ruane PJ, Santiago S, Schrader SR, Smith KY, Swaminathan S, Thompson MA, Wohl D, Wright DP. University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Comment in: BACKGROUND: To reduce lipid abnormalities and other side-effects associated with antiretroviral regimens containing lopinavir-ritonavir, patients might want to switch one or more components of their regimen. We compared substitution of raltegravir for lopinavir-ritonavir with continuation of lopinavir-ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with stable viral suppression on lopinavir-ritonavir-based combination therapy. METHODS: The SWITCHMRK 1 and 2 studies were multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, randomised controlled trials. HIV-infected patients aged 18 years or older were eligible if they had documented viral RNA (vRNA) concentration below the limit of assay quantification for at least 3 months while on a lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen. 707 eligible patients were randomly allocated by interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio to switch from lopinavir-ritonavir to raltegravir (400 mg twice daily; n=353) or to remain on lopinavir-ritonavir (two 200 mg/50 mg tablets twice daily; n=354), while continuing background therapy consisting of at least two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Primary endpoints were the mean percentage change in serum lipid concentrations from baseline to week 12; the proportion of patients with vRNA concentration less than 50 copies per mL at week 24 (with all treated patients who did not complete the study counted as failures) with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -12% for each study; and the frequency of adverse events up to 24 weeks. Analyses were done according to protocol. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00443703 and NCT00443729. FINDINGS: 702 patients received at least one dose of study drug and were included in the efficacy and safety analyses for the combined trials (raltegravir, n=350; lopinavir-ritonavir, n=352). Percentage changes in lipid concentrations from baseline to week 12 were significantly greater (p<0.0001) in the raltegravir group than in the lopinavir-ritonavir group in each study, yielding combined results for total cholesterol -12.6%vs 1.0%, non-HDL cholesterol -15.0%vs 2.6%, and triglycerides -42.2%vs 6.2%. At week 24, 293 (84.4%, 95% CI 80.2-88.1) of 347 patients in the raltegravir group had vRNA concentration less than 50 copies per mL compared with 319 (90.6%, 87.1-93.5) of 352 patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group (treatment difference -6.2%, -11.2 to -1.3). Clinical and laboratory adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in the treatment groups. There were no serious drug-related adverse events or deaths. The only drug-related clinical adverse event of moderate to severe intensity reported in 1% or more of either treatment group was diarrhoea, which occurred in ten patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group (3%) and no patients in the raltegravir group. The studies were terminated at week 24 because of lower than expected virological efficacy in the raltegravir group compared with the lopinavir-ritonavir group. INTERPRETATION: Although switching to raltegravir was associated with greater reductions in serum lipid concentrations than was continuation of lopinavir-ritonavir, efficacy results did not establish non-inferiority of raltegravir to lopinavir-ritonavir. FUNDING: Merck. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
