4. | Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):89-92. doi: 10.1038/nature12872. Epub 2013 Dec 22.Zanne AE1, Tank DC2, Cornwell WK3, Eastman JM2, Smith SA4, FitzJohn RG5, McGlinn DJ6, O'Meara BC7, Moles AT8, Reich PB9, Royer DL10, Soltis DE11, Stevens PF12, Westoby M13, Wright IJ13, Aarssen L14, Bertin RI15, Calaminus A16, Govaerts R17, Hemmings F8, Leishman MR13, Oleksyn J18, Soltis PS19, Swenson NG20, Warman L21, Beaulieu JM22. Author information: 11] Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA [2] Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri 63121, USA.21] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA [2] Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA.31] Department of Ecological Sciences, Systems Ecology, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands [2] Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.51] Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z4, Canada [2] Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.6Department of Biology and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, USA.7Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.8Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.91] Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA [2] Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia.10Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA.111] Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA [2] Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA [3] Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.12Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63121, USA.13Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.14Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.15Department of Biology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, USA.16Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.17Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, United Kingdom.181] Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA [2] Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Dendrology, 62-035 Kornik, Poland.191] Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA [2] Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.20Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.211] Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia [2] Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, USDA Forest Service, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, USA.22National Institute for Mathematical & Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.AbstractEarly flowering plants are thought to have been woody species restricted to warm habitats. This lineage has since radiated into almost every climate, with manifold growth forms. As angiosperms spread and climate changed, they evolved mechanisms to cope with episodic freezing. To explore the evolution of traits underpinning the ability to persist in freezing conditions, we assembled a large species-level database of growth habit (woody or herbaceous; 49,064 species), as well as leaf phenology (evergreen or deciduous), diameter of hydraulic conduits (that is, xylem vessels and tracheids) and climate occupancies (exposure to freezing). To model the evolution of species' traits and climate occupancies, we combined these data with an unparalleled dated molecular phylogeny (32,223 species) for land plants. Here we show that woody clades successfully moved into freezing-prone environments by either possessing transport networks of small safe conduits and/or shutting down hydraulic function by dropping leaves during freezing. Herbaceous species largely avoided freezing periods by senescing cheaply constructed aboveground tissue. Growth habit has long been considered labile, but we find that growth habit was less labile than climate occupancy. Additionally, freezing environments were largely filled by lineages that had already become herbs or, when remaining woody, already had small conduits (that is, the trait evolved before the climate occupancy). By contrast, most deciduous woody lineages had an evolutionary shift to seasonally shedding their leaves only after exposure to freezing (that is, the climate occupancy evolved before the trait). For angiosperms to inhabit novel cold environments they had to gain new structural and functional trait solutions; our results suggest that many of these solutions were probably acquired before their foray into the cold. |